A jury was deadlocked in a case regarding the shooting of a person being investigated, leading to a mistrial. It's odd to me that rules of law being questioned in nationalized courtrooms, which I thought once looked closely at the letter of and intent of law, appear to compartmentalize it.
In the screenshot above it suggests that the fraudulent warrant fact is not included in what a jury must have been asked to decide. The death of a person, as an accident, murder or course of criminality gone astray in a jury box mistrial, seems to be a foolish narrowed focus (probably a matter of law as well) for a mistrial to even occur. It seems to me, that a fraudulent no knock warrant is the premiere crime that leads to every other subsequent action, on the part of those acting in that fraud. The party who generated the fraudulent warrant, here it seems the decision about a subsequent death fully rests. If this officer acted in good faith in an unknown fraudlent document - once again - the focus of the jury, even if so directed, seems amiss. Maybe, taking the fraudster/s to court and charging them with murder would make more sense to a "jury of their peers." This deadlock is a travesty of justice - not for the officer, but for a jury so handtied they almost certaiy had to deadlock. Admittedly, I know nothing of the legal ins and outs here and I'm not a legal anything - but reason says - the source of this death is in the fraudulent order and in that place murder seems simple enough to consider - not necessarily for the person who pulled the trigger/s but due and fully attributable for and to the party who instigated a fraud in the first place.
---
~PsychoBabbleJabble, third options, bias....Kurt LaRose and TalkifUwant.
---
ARTICLE REFERENCE: https://news.yahoo.com/breonna-taylor-mistrial-know-jury-130527059.html
